Here's a curly question for the few people who believe the official Port Arthur story: Why was it necessary to threaten Wendy Scurr into silence after she traveled around Australia, telling people what she saw?
Wendy was the first aid officer at the Port Arthur Historic Site that day. She treated American Gun Control activist Dennis Olson for shotgun wounds, in her own words "the shot size was about the same as farmers use".
Yet the prosecution did not present Dennis Olson's witness statement to the court, neither did they include the shotgun in the list of firearms used by the gunman.
The judge specifically asks if the shotgun was used and Bugg QC says "No, it wasn't. It remained in the boot of the Volvo."
So if the prosecution got this detail wrong, it begs the question: what else did they get wrong?
So if the prosecution got this detail wrong, it begs the question: what else did they get wrong?
Inquest required.
Where's the DNA evidence from the cutlery the cafe shooter used, proving it was Martin?
Bugg QC told Wendy she would not be called as a witness, despite having stayed at the crime scene all day and helping the traumatised and wounded.
Wendy toured around Australia, giving lectures and interviews about what she saw and exposing the inconsistencies in the case. One day, she received a package to her home address: a plaque that said "Quit 1996" - the threat was clear: we know where you live. Stop blowing the whistle on this.
So, if Martin was guilty of this crime, why was it necessary the threaten Wendy into silence? Why not just prove her wrong with the facts and evidence? Surely there is an explanation which reconciles all the facts and witness statements into a single story that is very close to the truth...
This incident is not a conspiracy theory, fantasy or conjecture. It happened.
Here are the photos of the plaque and envelope. You can read the story at this link:
If you believe Martin Bryant was truly guilty, then you need to ask yourself: why was Wendy Scurr and her family threatened into silence?
And if someone would send death threats to a middle-aged woman and her family, surely that person or persons are capable of other evil, like setting up a mentally ill man for mass murder.
This explosive new thriller presents a plausible, possible alternative that fits the facts and witness statements closer than the official story. You can get it on Amazon or Lulu if Amazon won't ship to Australia.
Amazon Paperback:
https://tinyurl.com/y8uulhsd
https://tinyurl.com/y8uulhsd
Kindle:
https://tinyurl.com/ycr883g9
https://tinyurl.com/ycr883g9
Lulu Paperback, for Aus readers since Amazon doesn't like shipping Down Under:
The plaque with a simple message: Quit 1996
The envelope sent to Wendy's home
No comments:
Post a Comment